MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032880912 · doi:10.12745/et.9.1.714

Book Review: Philip Schwyzer. <em>Literature, Nationalism, and Memory in Early Modern England and Wales</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

2006· article· en· W2032880912 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christopher Ivic

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Theatre · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalismArtMedia studiesPerformance artHistoryArt historySociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is a historical and theoretical study of the ways in which English and Welsh writers of the Tudor era came to 'recognize that those who lived in "other days", and whose customs, politics, and even language ... at first glance appear[ed] dauntingly alien, were all along members of the same community' (2).Of course, such recognition was more difficult for English than for Welsh writers since the ancient Britons with whom the English began to identify in the Tudor era were not their own ancestors, nor were they English.In its focus on the production of a British national consciousness, this book differs from recent critical work on the English nation state and English national identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly TheatreSame topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207