MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032936256 · doi:10.2741/1809

Transcriptional regulation of matrix metalloprotease gene expression in health and disease

2006· review· en· W2032936256 on OpenAlexaff
Arturo Mancini

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracellular matrixJuxtacrine signallingCell biologyMatrix metalloproteinaseRegulation of gene expressionGene expressionFunction (biology)ADAMTSBiologyVersicanPhenotypeGeneChemistryMetalloproteinaseProteoglycanGeneticsCell cultureAutocrine signallingThrombospondin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex network of collagens, proteoglycans, glycoproteins, polysaccharides and other secreted proteins that plays fundamental structural and functional roles. In addition to its key function as an extracellular space-filling scaffold, the ECM is also implicated in the formation of important cell-cell and cell-ECM (i.e. juxtacrine) interactions that subsequently provide key regulatory signals that influence cellular proliferation and viability, differentiation, specialization and gene expression. Regulated turnover of the ECM, a process largely mediated by the tightly controlled matrix metalloprotease (MMP) enzyme family, is critical to a number of physiological processes involved in growth and development while aberrant turnover of matrix components is associated with congenital and metabolic diseases. The following review will focus on the transcriptional aspects of MMP gene expression, particularly in diseased states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207