MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A second<i>tonB</i>gene in<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>is linked to the<i>exbB</i>and<i>exbD</i>genes

2000· article· he· W2032985706 on OpenAlexaff
Qixun Zhao, Keith Poole

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersMedical Research CouncilCystic Fibrosis Foundation
KeywordsBiologyComplementationHeminGeneEscherichia coliMutantPseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyMolecular biologyGeneticsHemeBacteriaBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exbBD genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO were cloned by complementation of the growth defect of an Escherichia coli exbB tolQ double mutant on iron-restricted medium. Nucleotide sequence analysis confirmed that these genes are contiguous and preceded by a second tonB gene in this organism, which we have designated tonB2. lacZ promoter fusions confirmed that expression of the tonB2-exbB-exbD genes is increased under conditions of iron limitation. Deletions within any of these genes, in contrast to deletions in the first tonB gene, tonB1, did not adversely affect growth on iron-restricted medium. On the other hand, tonB1 tonB2 double mutants were more compromised as regards growth in an iron-restricted medium than a tonB1 deletion, indicating that TonB2 could partially replace TonB1 in its role in iron acquisition. TonB1 but not TonB2 deletion strains were also compromised as regards the utilization of hemin or hemoglobin as sole iron sources, indicating that heme transport requires TonB1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207