Auditory Brainstem Responses in Newborns With Complete Cleft Palate and Lip at a Japanese Perinatal Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Children with cleft palate sometimes suffer from abnormalities in any part of the ear, especially from the middle ear. It is important to identify hearing loss early by monitoring their auditory sensitivity on a regular basis, in order to minimize complications of abnormal or fluctuating hearing on speech development in patients with cleft palate. Methods: We examined auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in 13 Japanese newborns with complete cleft palate and lip at 4.1 ± 2.2 days after delivery compared with sex-, age- and weight-matched 13 Japanese newborns without cleft palate or lip as control. Results: Wave I component latency (CL) was longer in ABRs of infants with complete cleft palate and lip than control newborns, while waves III and V CLs and the wave I-V interpeak latency (IPL) were not different. Conclusions: The current results indicate the presence of congenital conductive hearing disturbance in newborns with complete cleft palate and lip. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2014;3(3):86-88 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/ijcp168w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".