MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032991614 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.045311

Theory of exciton fine structure in semiconductor quantum dots: Quantum dot anisotropy and lateral electric field

2010· article· en· W2032991614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsQuantum dotHamiltonian (control theory)Condensed matter physicsExcitonPhysicsAnisotropyElectric fieldWave functionFine structureOscillator strengthElectronMany-body theoryQuantum dot laserBiexcitonElectro-absorption modulatorEffective mass (spring–mass system)Quantum wellQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theory of exciton fine structure in semiconductor quantum dots and its dependence on quantum-dot anisotropy and external lateral electric field is presented. The effective exciton Hamiltonian including long-range electron-hole exchange interaction is derived within the $k\ensuremath{\cdot}p$ effective-mass approximation. The exchange matrix elements of the Hamiltonian are expressed explicitly in terms of electron and hole envelope functions. The matrix element responsible for the ``bright'' exciton splitting is identified and analyzed. An excitonic fine structure for a model quantum dot with quasi-two-dimensional anisotropic harmonic oscillator confining potential is analyzed as a function of the shape anisotropy, size, and applied lateral electric field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it