MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033040352 · doi:10.1007/s10227-006-0101-3

Efalizumab, a reversible T-cell modulator for psoriasis

2005· review· en· W2033040352 on OpenAlexaff
Neil H. Shear, Richard G. Langley, Vincent Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityHealth Sciences CentreQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEfalizumabPsoriasisMedicineMonoclonal antibodyImmunologyMonoclonalCD8PharmacologyAntibodyPlaque psoriasisImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The humanized monoclonal antibody (MAb) efalizumab (Raptiva) was developed to meet a longstanding need for specific, safe, and effective anti-psoriatic treatments. Efalizumab, which is directed at the lymphocyte surface protein LFA-1, prevents multiple interactions between T cells and other cell types. Here, we review the inflammatory pathway that drives the development of psoriasis, and we discuss several mechanisms by which efalizumab suppresses skin inflammation in psoriasis. Efalizumab reversibly increases circulating T-cell counts, as T cells--including pathogenic CD8 memory T cells that are prominent in psoriatic lesions-- are specifically restrained from leaving the bloodstream and entering the skin. Within two weeks of the onset of efalizumab treatment, cell surface and intracellular LFA-1 pools are substantially cleared by lysosomal degradation. Residual surface LFA-1 molecules remain saturated with bound efalizumab for some weeks following cessation of treatment. Efalizumab's pharmacodynamic properties are consistent with its profound and reversible beneficial effects on the histopathology of psoriatic skin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207