Les Franco-Terre-Neuviens : survie et renaissance équivoques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des trois noyaux francophones de Terre-Neuve, seul celui de Port-au-Port est enraciné dans le milieu. Ses origines française et acadienne rappellent l'ancien statut juridique de cette Côte Française et les grandes migrations acadiennes du 19e siècle. En dépit d'un peuplement anarchique, de l'absence d'institutions autonomes et de relations intimes avec le monde francophone, le maintien de l'identité ethnique est assuré jusqu'à la Deuxième Guerre. Dès lors la mise en place d'une hiérarchie régionale et le passage d'une économie familiale à une économie prolétaire provoquent de profonds remous culturels. Le statut minoritaire est confirmé; il en découle une assimilation généralisée. Cependant, vers les années 1970, ce processus est remis en question avec l'apparition d'une petite élite locale consciente de son identité ethnique, et l'intervention d'un gouvernement fédéral cherchant à assurer la survie d'une francophonie pan-canadienne. Soutenue uniquement par le Fédéral et n'intéressant que l'élite locale, la renaissance qui en suit reste équivoque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".