MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033080733 · doi:10.1080/00207170410001663516

Feedback stabilization of strongly non-linear systems using the CBH formula

2004· article· en· W2033080733 on OpenAlexafffund
H. Michalska, Miguel Torres‐Torriti

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSatisficingMathematicsLyapunov functionAffine transformationState (computer science)Control theory (sociology)Linear systemClass (philosophy)Linear programmingSelection (genetic algorithm)Stability (learning theory)Applied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisNonlinear systemComputer scienceControl (management)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach to the construction of stabilizing feedback for strongly non-linear systems. The class of systems of interest includes systems with drift which are affine in the controls and which cannot be stabilized by continuous state feedback. The approach is independent of the selection of a Lyapunov function, but requires the on-line solution of a non-linear programming satisficing problem stated in terms of expressions resulting from the composition of flows via the Campbell–Baker–Hausdorff formula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ControlSame topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207