MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033081696 · doi:10.1017/s0022112004002800

Instability in flow through elastic conduits and volcanic tremor

2005· article· en· W2033081696 on OpenAlexaff
Neil J. Balmforth, R. V. Craster, A. Rust

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsInstabilityReynolds numberViscosityPhysicsElastic instabilityWavenumberViscous liquidFlow (mathematics)Fluid dynamicsCompressibilityClassical mechanicsGeologyTurbulenceOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stability of fluid flow through a narrow conduit with elastic walls is explored, treating the fluid as incompressible and viscous, and the walls as semi-infinite linear Hookean solids. Instabilities analogous to roll waves occur in this system; we map out the physical regime in which they are excited. For elastic wave speeds much higher than the fluid speed, a critical Reynolds number is required for instability. However, that critical value depends linearly on wavenumber, and so can be made arbitrarily small for long waves. For smaller elastic wave speeds, the critical Reynolds number is reduced still further, and Rayleigh waves can be destabilized by the fluid even at zero Reynolds number. A brief discussion is given of the nonlinear dynamics of the instabilities for large elastic wave speed, and the significance of the results to the phenomenon of volcanic tremor is presented. Although magma itself seems unlikely to generate flow-induced vibrations, the rapid flow through fractured rock of low-viscosity fluids exsolved from magma appears to be a viable mechanism for volcanic tremor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207