Methane gas-phase dynamics in marine sediments: A model study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A one-dimensional reactive transport model including mass, momentum and volume conservation for the solid, aqueous, and gaseous phases is developed to explore the fate of free methane gas in marine sediments. The model assumes steady--state compaction for the solid phase in addition to decoupled gas and aqueous phase transport, instigated by processes such as buoyancy, externally impressed flows and compaction. Chemical species distributions are governed by gas advection, dissolved advection and diffusion as well as by reaction processes, which include organoclastic sulfate reduction, methanogenesis and anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). The model is applied to Eckernförde Bay, a shallow-water environment where acoustic profiles confirm a widespread occurrence of year-round biogenic free methane gas within the muddy regions of the sediment, and where subsurface methanogenesis, overlaid by a zone of AOM has been reported. The model results reveal that, under steady-state conditions, upward gas migration is an effective methane transport mechanism from oversaturated to undersaturated intervals of the sediment. Furthermore, sensitivity tests show that when methanogenesis rates increase, the gas flux to the AOM zone becomes progressively more important and may reach values comparable to those of the aqueous methane diffusive flux. Nevertheless, the model also proves that the gas transport rates always remain smaller than the removal rates by combined gaseous methane dissolution and oxidation. Consequently, for the range of environmental conditions investigated here, the AOM zone acts as an efficient subsurface barrier for both aqueous and gaseous methane, preventing methane escape from the sediments to the water column.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it