MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033113284 · doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.998376

Caution! Warning Labels About Alcohol and Pregnancy: Unintended Consequences and Questionable Effectiveness

2015· letter· en· W2033113284 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Bell, Natalie Zizzo, Éric Racine

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnintended pregnancyPublic healthPregnancyUnintended consequencesSet (abstract data type)PsychologyInternet privacyMedicineEnvironmental healthPublic relationsCriminologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawFamily planningNursingPopulationResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Louise and colleagues (2015) propose an important set of ethical issues that must be considered before promoting warning labels as a public health tool for alcohol-related risk of cancer. Their exa...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.086
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.086
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.1060.075
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207