MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033158160 · doi:10.1504/ijaac.2012.051881

Robust fault detection filter for non-linear state-delay networked control system

2012· article· en· W2033158160 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaomei Qi, Chengjin Zhang, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Automation and Control · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFault detection and isolationState (computer science)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)Real-time computingControl (management)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust fault detection filter (RFDF) problem is investigated for a non-linear state-delay networked control system (NCS) with model uncertainty and data packet dropout. In both sensor-to-controller link and controller-to-actuator link, the random data packet dropouts are described by two variables, which obey the Bernoulli distribution. An observer-based RFDF is presented as a residual generator, and the residual dynamical system is modelled as a novel stochastic non-linear NCS with state-delay, model uncertainty, external disturbance. A performance index is proposed to deal with the robustness issue, which is to enhance the robustness of the residual generator against network-induced uncertainties and disturbances, without significant loss of the sensitivity of faults. Sufficient condition for asymptotically mean-square stable of this residual dynamical system is derived. Then, the desired RFDF is obtained, which is constructed in terms of certain linear matrix inequality. Finally, two numerical examples are employed to illustrate that the proposed approach performs better than the existing approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Automation and ControlSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207