MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033176702 · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.7.1835

Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections

2005· letter· en· W2033176702 on OpenAlexaff
Ravi Retnakaran, J. Hans DeVries, H Hanaire-Broutin, Robert J. Heine, V. Melki, Bernard Zinman

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2005
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersUniversity of New South WalesAmerican Diabetes Association
KeywordsMedicineGlycemicContext (archaeology)InsulinInsulin aspartDiabetes mellitusInsulin analogRandomized controlled trialType 1 diabetesInsulin lisproInternal medicineAnesthesiaSurgeryEndocrinologyHuman insulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily insulin injection (MDII) therapy, the optimal meal insulin is a rapid-acting analog (lispro or aspart). To date, the efficacy of CSII versus MDII therapy has been evaluated in a limited number of randomized controlled trials in which rapid-acting analogs were used for both regimens. In this context, we recently conducted a pooled analysis (1) using raw trial data from three such studies undertaken in adults with type 1 diabetes (2–4). This analysis suggested that CSII is associated with better glycemic control, particularly in those patients with poor initial control. Indeed, the relative benefit of CSII over …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207