MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033218924 · doi:10.5589/m07-006

Towards traffic monitoring with TerraSAR-X

2007· article· en· W2033218924 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Franz J. Meyer, Stefan Hinz, Rupert Müller, Gintautas Palubinskas, Christopher Laux, Hartmut Runge

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarContext (archaeology)AerospaceComputer scienceA priori and a posterioriRemote sensingRadarGeographyReal-time computingEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an overview of the traffic monitoring project initiated in the context of the TerraSAR-X mission and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) transportation research program. A short description of the TerraSAR-X instrument is presented, followed by an analysis of the necessary TerraSAR-X system settings for traffic monitoring and an assessment of the expected image quality. Based on a brief revision of the theory of moving object effects in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images and a quantification of these effects for the TerraSAR-X case, an outline is presented of the processing system that is currently implemented to detect moving vehicles and estimate their velocities. Special emphasis is placed on the integration of a priori information derived from road databases for improving detection rates and velocity estimation accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207