Oral methylphenidate fails to elicit significant changes in extracellular putaminal dopamine levels in Parkinson's disease patients: Positron emission tomographic studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we assessed the changes of endogenous dopamine (DA) levels in response to methylphenidate in 5 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and 6 healthy controls. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography was performed with the D2 receptor antagonist [11C]raclopride (RAC) at baseline and 1 hour following the administration of oral methylphenidate (0.8 mg/kg) to assess changes in dopamine levels indirectly. Oral methylphenidate produced no significant change in extracellular DA levels in the putamen, as estimated by comparing changes in RAC binding at baseline and 1 hour following its administration in PD subjects and healthy controls. However, there were small changes in RAC binding of opposite direction in caudate and ventral striatal regions compared between the two groups. Although there was no consistent improvement in motor function in the PD group, some patients did experience a subjective high in response to methylphenidate (MP). Failure of oral MP to alter extracellular DA levels in putamen could result from degeneration of presynaptic dopaminergic terminals, with consequent severe reductions in the levels of endogenous DA and dopamine transporter in PD subjects. Our data provide in vivo neurochemical support for the lack of clinical efficacy following MP in PD patients and are also in keeping with reduced DA release following amphetamine in PD subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".