A Retrospective Radiographic Analysis of Subaxial Sagittal Alignment After Posterior C1–C2 Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Subaxial sagittal alignment following atlantoaxial (A-A) posterior fusion was investigated retrospectively in patients with A-A subluxation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between A-A fusion angle and postoperative subaxial sagittal alignment and to determine the optimal fusion angle for preservation of physiologic subaxial alignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A-A posterior fusion has been used for patients with A-A instability and provided satisfactory clinical results. However, there are patients showing unexpected development of subaxial kyphosis after surgery. The reasons for subaxial kyphosis after A-A fusion remain unclear. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with A-A subluxation who underwent several types of posterior A-A fusion were involved. There were 46 women and 30 men. The causes of A-A subluxation were rheumatoid arthritis in 47, trauma in 16, os odontoideum in 8, and unknown in 5. The methods of posterior fusion consisted of Magerl procedure with posterior wiring in 51, Brooks wiring in 18, and Halifax clamp in 7. Angles at C1-C2, C2-C7, and C1-C7 in the neural position were measured before surgery and at the final follow-up to find out any association between postoperative C2-C7 angle and the other radiologic parameters. The association between O-C1 range of motion and C2-C7 angle was also investigated. RESULTS: The mean angles of C1-C2, C2-C7, and C1-C7 before surgery were 18.4 degrees, 14.5 degrees, and 32.9 degrees, respectively. Those at the final follow-up were 26.0 degrees, 5.5 degrees, and 31.5 degrees, respectively. These results indicated that C1-C2 fixation in a hyperlordotic position led to a subaxial kyphosis after surgery. Statistics showed that there was a linear association between the C1-C2 lordotic fixation angle and the C2-C7 kyphotic angle. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical fixation of A-A joint in a hyperlordotic position will lead the lower cervical spine to a kyphotic sagittal alignment after surgery. To maintain the physiologic sagittal alignment of the subaxial cervical spine, C1-C2 should not be fixed in a hyperlordotic position.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".