MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033248409 · doi:10.1056/nejm200101113440205

Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis

2001· article· en· W2033248409 on OpenAlexaff
O da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNecrotizing enterocolitisEnterocolitisIntensive care medicinePediatricsGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure 1. A baby required active resuscitation when he was born at 26 weeks of gestation weighing 918 g. The Apgar scores were 2, 3, and 7 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. The early neonatal period was complicated by systemic hypotension and respiratory distress syndrome. The infant was given inotropic support, surfactant, and antibiotics. A patent ductus arteriosus was surgically ligated after a trial of indomethacin failed. The infant was intubated and received oxygen for 51 days, and he achieved full enteral feeding on day 26. On day 52 extensive abdominal distention, bilious gastric aspirate, frank blood in . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207