Responses to Online Photographs of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: A Thematic Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is concern that graphic pictures of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) may detrimentally impact vulnerable viewers--namely those who may self-injure. How individuals (most who have, but some of whom have not, self-injured) respond to photographs of NSSI is currently unknown. Thematic analysis was used to assess testimony regarding NSSI imagery online. Analysis of testimony regarding NSSI photographs revealed a dichotomy. Individuals reporting positive perceptions said the photographs reduced loneliness and NSSI enactment. People reporting negative perceptions argued photographs reinforce and encourage NSSI. Experiences of being triggered by NSSI images were described by several participants. Photographs of NSSI posted online may have several risks for viewers. It is important to achieve a greater understanding of the effects of various forms of online NSSI content and to develop supportive NSSI resources on the Internet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it