Interstitial cells of Cajal and adaptive relaxation in the mouse stomach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) are proposed to play a role in stretch activation of nerves and are under intense investigation for potential roles in enteric innervation. Most data to support such roles come from in vitro studies with muscle strips whereas data at the whole organ level are scarce. To obtain insight into the role of ICC in distention-induced motor patterns developing at the organ level, we studied distension-induced adaptive relaxation in the isolated whole stomach of wild-type and W/W(v) mice. A method was developed to assess gastric adaptive relaxation that gave quantitative information on rates of pressure development and maximal adaptive relaxation. Pressure development was monitored throughout infusion of 1 ml of solution over a 10-min period. The final intraluminal pressure was sensitive to blockade of nitric oxide synthase, in wild-type and W/W(v) mice to a similar extent, indicating NO-mediated relaxation in W/W(v) mice. Adaptive relaxation occurred between 0.2 and 0.5 ml of solution infusion; this reflex was abolished by TTX, was not sensitive to blockade of nitric oxide synthase, but was abolished by apamin, suggesting that ATP and not nitric oxide is the neurotransmitter responsible for this intrinsic reflex. Despite the absence of intramuscular ICC (ICC-IM), normal gastric adaptive relaxation occurred in the W/W(v) stomach. Because pressure development was significantly lower in W/W(v) mice compared with wild type in all the conditions studied, including in the presence of TTX, ICC-IM may play a role in development of myogenic tone. In conclusion, a mouse model was developed to assess the intrinsic component of gastric accommodation. This showed that ICC-IM are not essential for activation of intrinsic sensory nerves nor ATP-driven adaptive relaxation nor NO-mediated relaxation in the present model. ICC-IM may be involved in regulation of (distention-induced) myogenic tone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".