Lead content in autopsy liver tissue in samples from Greenlandic Inuit and Danes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To measure the quantity of lead (Pb) in liver tissue samples from Greenlandic Inuit, and compare the results with those obtained in Caucasian Danes. STUDY DESIGN: Observational, descriptive survey on environmental pathology. METHODS: The setting was related to forensic medicine and hospitalised care in Nuuk, Ilulissat and Copenhagen. Participants were 50 Greenlandic Inuit (27 men) with a median age of 61 years (range 23-83) and 74 Danes (44 men) with a median age of 60 years (range 15-87). Liver tissue samples (normal by macroscopic and microscopic examination) were obtained at autopsy. Total liver lead content was measured by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with a detection limit of 0.05 micromol/kg dry weight. RESULTS: In the entire series, Inuit had higher liver lead contents than Danes (p < 0.0001). Inuit men had higher liver lead content than Inuit women (p = 0.02). In Danes, men tended to have higher liver lead contents than women, but the difference was insignificant. The median (5-95 percentile) lead content was 14.96 micromol/kg dry liver (4.83-74.80) in Inuit, and < 0.05 micromol/kg dry liver (< 0.05-29.44) in Danes. All Inuit had liver lead contents above the detection limit, whereas 60 Danes (81%) had liver lead content below the detection limit. There was a positive correlation between liver lead content and age in both Inuit (rs = 0.46, p = 0.002) and Danes (n = 14; rs = 0.71, p = 0.01). Inuit had higher hepatic lead indices (liver lead content divided by age) than Danes (p < 0.0001). In Inuit, median hepatic lead index was 0.258, being higher in men than in women (p = 0.02). In Danes, the median hepatic lead index was 0.001, again higher in men than in women (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a gender-related difference in hepatic lead content, i.e. Inuit men have higher liver lead contents than women. Furthermore, Inuit men and women have higher hepatic lead contents than Danish men and women. In both Inuit and Danes, the liver lead content increases with age. One reason for the high lead levels in Inuit may be ingestion of seabirds contaminated by lead shot.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".