Modulation and roles of the endothelins in the pathophysiology of pulmonary embolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent research on the endothelins (ETs) and their pathways in acute pulmonary embolism (APE) has led to significant advances in the understanding of this disease. ETs are potent vasoconstrictors and bronchoconstrictors found abundantly in the lung and can be released by stimuli such as endothelial injury, hypoxia, or thrombin, a key product in the coagulation cascade. Many studies using different approaches and methods of inducing pulmonary embolization, both in vitro and in vivo in various species, have mostly shown that ETs play an important role in the pathophysiology of APE. These results were obtained by comparing the hemodynamic data in the presence or absence of various ETs inhibitors, but also by assessing the modulation of the ET-related elements of this system by molecular, cell biology, and pharmacological methods. Based on the current understanding, a mechanism involving the ET pathway in the pathophysiology of APE is proposed for the reader's considerations. We postulate that ETs are primary mediators in APE based on the following: (i) their source from pulmonary endothelial cells where the primary injury takes place; (ii) their direct vasconstrictive, bronchoconstrictive, and promitogenic effects via distinct ET receptors; and (iii) their indirect effects associated with the secondary release of thromboxane and other mediators, which are released from inflammatory cells and platelets, which together can potentiate the overall hemodynamic response, most specifically the pulmonary vascular bed. Such combined effects of ETs on bronchomotor and vasomotor tone in the lung can adversely affect ventilation perfusion matching and lead to severe hypoxemia without causing significant changes in the chest X-ray of these patients. Thus, we may consider ET inhibitors as future current therapeutic agents in patients with PE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".