Lack of involvement of endothelin‐1 in angiotensin II‐induced contraction of the isolated rat tail artery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. The contribution of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated contraction of the isolated rat tail artery was assessed with measurements of tension, and cytosolic calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)). The distribution of the AT(1) receptor was studied with RT - PCR and immunohistochemistry. 2. Ang II induced an endothelium-independent contraction (pEC(50) 7.95+/-0.06 and E(max): 0.46 g+/-0.05 with endothelium vs 7.81+/-0.02 and 0.41 g+/-0.07 without endothelium; P>0.05). Ang II (0.003 - 0.3 microM)-induced a non-sustained contraction of endothelium-intact preparations which was not antagonized by BQ-123 (1 microM), but was inhibited by losartan (10 nM). In addition, the maximal contraction induced by ET-1 (0.1 microM) could be further increased by the addition of 0.1 microM Ang II. 3. Ang II (0.001 - 0.3 microM) elevated [Ca(2+)](i) in single vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in a dose-dependent manner (pEC(50) 9.12+/-0.26) and the Ang II-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were not affected by a Ca(2+)-free solution, but were abolished by pretreatment with caffeine (5 mM). Ang II did not increase [Ca(2+)](i) in endothelial cells. ET-1 (0.1 microM) increased [Ca(2+)](i) in single VSMCs in a normal Ca(2+) containing physiological saline solution (PSS), but not in a Ca(2+)-free solution. 4. Ang II-induced contraction was insensitive to inhibition by nifedipine (0.1 microM), an antagonist of L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, and SK&F96365 (10 microM), which blocks non-selective cation channels, whereas that to ET-1 was inhibited by SK&F69365. 5. RT - PCR data indicate the expression of AT(1A) and AT(1B) on both VSMCs and endothelial cells, but immunohistochemical evidence illustrates that the AT(1) is located primarily on VSMCs. 6. These results indicate that endothelium-derived ET-1 is not involved in the Ang II-mediated vasoconstriction of the rat tail artery and that Ang II- and ET-1-mediated VSM contractions utilize distinct pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".