MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033323822 · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/35/21/324

Relaxation processes in aromatic polyimide

2002· article· en· W2033323822 on OpenAlexaff
A. A. Alagiriswamy, K. S. Narayan, Govinda Raju

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics D Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKaptonMaterials sciencePolyimidePolingRelaxation (psychology)Thermal conductionActivation energyDipoleIsothermal processCharge carrierSpace chargeConductivityElectric fieldElectrical resistivity and conductivityTrappingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Condensed matter physicsChemical physicsThermodynamicsNanotechnologyDielectricChemistryOptoelectronicsElectronComposite materialPhysicsPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical conduction in non-conjugated insulating polymers such as Kapton(R) films was studied as a function of temperature, T (15–500 K) and electric field F (⩽16 kV cm−1). The time dependent isothermal transient currents (ITC) were also studied at different temperatures (15 K<T<500 K). Thermally stimulated discharge current (TSDC) studies were carried out as a function of initial poling conditions. A distinct change in conduction mechanism as a function of T was observed at T⩾300 K from DC conductivity, ITC and TSDC measurements. The origin of this behaviour is discussed in terms of transition of dipolar at low T to space charge mechanism at high T which can be attributed to carrier trapping and release of charge carriers from the trap states. The effective barrier energy, Δ, for transport and hopping parameter λ(T) are estimated for Kapton on the basis of these studies. The results obtained for Kapton suggest that, for T<Tg at low or moderate fields, the transient currents are essentially governed by dipolar relaxation mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics D Applied PhysicsSame topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207