MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033326121 · doi:10.1139/l00-015

Experimental measurement and finite element analysis of the deformation of a high-pressure sluice gate

2000· article· en· W2033326121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuen‐Shii Chou, Shou-Chih Lou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsSluiceFinite element methodStrain gaugeDeformation (meteorology)Gate valveGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringWater pressureMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deformation of a high-pressure sluice gate under an orthogonal water pressure load of 0.539 MPa (i.e., 55 m water height), acting upon the upstream side of a gate leaf, was studied numerically and experimentally. The sluice gate was installed at the end of a water-release tunnel in the Nan-Hwa Reservoir, Nan-Hwa, Taiwan, R.O.C. The numerical results obtained using the ANSYS 5.5.2 finite element program agreed reasonably well with the experimental data. The deformation of this high-pressure sluice gate under water pressure loads of 0.736 MPa (i.e., 75 m water height) and 0.931 MPa (i.e., 95 m water height) was predicted by ANSYS 5.5.2. The research reported here may provide a method for establishing a safety monitoring system for any high-pressure gate and provide engineers with useful information to evaluate the possibility of increasing the capacity of an existing reservoir.Key words: sluice gate leaf, finite element method (FEM), strain gauge, water pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207