MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Limits of the sympathetic skin response in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy

2000· article· en· W2033328252 on OpenAlexaff
Vera Bril, Muya Nyunt, Madeline Ngo

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolyneuropathySural nerveAutonomic neuropathyDiabetes mellitusPeripheral neuropathyPeripheralAutonomic nervous systemDiabetic neuropathyInternal medicineCardiologyAnesthesiaSurgeryEndocrinologyHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed upper- and lower-limb sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) in a series of 337 diabetic patients with and without peripheral polyneuropathy and 38 reference subjects. We did not find any correlations between SSRs and symptoms of pain or autonomic dysfunction. The SSR correlated more strongly with vibration perception threshold (VPT) and sural nerve amplitude than with cooling detection threshold (CDT) or clinical symptoms. We conclude that current limitations inherent in SSR testing preclude its use as a reliable and consistent index of the autonomic dysfunction commonly encountered in diabetic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuscle & NerveSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207