MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033344540 · doi:10.1680/grim.2001.5.1.3

Effects of electrode materials and current intermittence in electro-osmosis

2001· article· en· W2033344540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersFetzer Institute
KeywordsElectrodeOsmotic coefficientAnodeElectro-osmosisChemistryMaterials scienceOsmosisPermeability (electromagnetism)Analytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrolyteElectrophoresisMembraneChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of electrode materials and current intermittence on the coefficient of electro-osmotic permeability and the voltage loss at the soil-electrode interfaces are investigated using a marine soil. An electro-osmotic testing cell is designed and fabricated to measure the electro-osmotic induced flow under known boundary conditions. Six pairs of electrodes are tested for the voltage loss at the soil- electrode interfaces and for the coefficient of electroosmotic permeability. The losses in the applied voltage are found to be dependent on the anode material and are less in metallic anodes (steel or copper) than carbon anodes. The coefficients of electro-osmotic permeability are relatively independent of the electrode materials and are controlled by the effective electric field intensity in the soil. The application of current intermittence generates a higher electro-osmotic flow than continuous d.c. for the same applied voltage and the open electric circuit is superior to the short electric circuit configuration. The coefficient of electro-osmotic permeability is maximum using current intermittence of 2 min on/1 min off and open-circuit configuration for the soil tested. Nous étudions, en utilisant un sol marin, les effets des matériaux des électrodes et de l'intermittence de courant sur le coefficient de perméabilitéélectro-osmotique et la perte de tension aux interfaces sol-électrode. Nous avons conçu et fabriquéune cellule d'essai électro-osmotique pour mesurer le flux provoquépar électro-osmose en conditions limites connues. Nous testons six paires d'électrodes pour la perte de tension aux interfaces sol-électrodes et pour le coefficient de perméabilité électroosmotique. Nous constatons que les pertes de tension appliquée dépendent du matériau de l'anode et sont moindres avec les anodes métalliques (acier ou cuivre) qu'avec les anodes en carbone. Les coefficients de perméabilité électro-osmotique sont relativement indépendants du matériau de l'électrode et sont fonction de l'intensité du champ é lectrique effectif dans le sol. L'application d'un courant intermittent produit un flux é lectro-osmotique plus e levéque l'application d'un courant direct continu pour la même tension appliquée; et le circuit é lectrique ouvert est supérieur àla configuration de circuit é lectrique court. Le coefficient de perméabilitéé lectro-osmotique est à son maximum quand on utilise un courant intermittent activé pendant 2 minutes et désactivépendant 1 minute et une configuration à circuit ouvert pour le sol testé

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it