MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2033349233 · doi:10.1353/can.2006.0026

Insiders and Outsiders: Alan Cairns and the Reshaping of Canadian Citizenship (review)

2006· article· en· W2033349233 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ian McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipCharterPoliticsCommissionLawSovereigntyPolitical scienceSociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Insiders and Outsiders: Alan Cairns and the Reshaping of Canadian Citizenship Ian McKay Insiders and Outsiders: Alan Cairns and the Reshaping of Canadian Citizenship. Edited by Gerald Kernerman and Philip Resnick. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2005. Pp. 378, illus., $85.00 cloth, $24.95 paper For forty years, Alan Cairns has towered over the Crisis of Canada, as patriot, prophet, and political theorist. He was among the first to understand the epochal significance of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as a transmogrifying agent of the Canadian imagined community. He has been a most significant and subtle (if hardly the most vociferous) interpreter of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. He added his own clarifying 'Plan C' to the Plans A and B to the sovereignty- vs.-federalism struggle. This often rewarding festschrift brings together twenty-nine scholars, mainly political scientists, who have all been influenced by Cairns's remarkable writings. One of its many virtues is that, unlike most collections in this genre, it makes so much room for incisive critiques of the work of the scholar it honours – who enjoys an enviable record of quietly reshaping every major debate he enters. Cairns's own brief contribution helps us grasp why he could make such an original contribution. He was trained at Oxford as an Africanist, and approached the Canadian scene with a sharp sense of the turmoil that empires can leave behind them. His assumption was that if the Canadian centre could survive the centrifugal forces of modernity, conflicting nationalisms, and the rights revolution, it would be only through its self-disciplined disavowal of absolutes and its openness to complexity. Cairns was thus prepared by his training as an Africanist to make a uniquely cosmopolitan and mature contribution to the discussion of the Canadian Crisis – although, to his and many of his colleagues' cost, they do not exhibit many signs of having read much recent Canadian history per se. Read against its grain, this collection documents a liberal order enmeshed in ever-deepening, perhaps fatal, contradictions. As Cairns shows, and subsequent experience largely confirms, the electoral system routinely generates results unreflective of the political diversity of the country's regions. As contributors to the outstanding four-chapter section on Aboriginal–non-Aboriginal relations variously demonstrate, the upshot of First Nations nationalism is to de-legitimize the conventional Canadian narrative. As Cairns showed so clearly, the colonial status quo cannot be preserved. It also seems impossible to change it. The voices of our political scientists wisely counsel calm discussion, active listening, moderate words. Many do not seem to grasp the deep pattern of the crisis. They cannot grasp the structural contradictions of a [End Page 137] liberal order dangerously incapable of understanding its conflicted past or theorizing its post-colonial future. One has to wonder if all's well with this liberal world when as eminent a publishing house as UBC Press permits a book with its imprint to include the following sentence: 'After all, it is not self-evident that spousal benefits as a justiciable right belong to lesbian couples, or that men may collect kiddie porn instead of stamps' (109). Ian McKay Queen's University Copyright © 2006 University of Toronto Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→