Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Flow Behavior in a Tapered Rectangular Sprue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study is part of a continuing effort to obtain a better understanding of the rheological behavior during the injection molding of unfilled and reinforced polymers and help improve the prediction by numerical three dimensional simulation of the process. The slightly tapered rectangular sprue of a centrally gated plaque mold was equipped with flush mounted pressure sensors to monitor the time evolution of the wall shear stress prior to entering the cavity. Two Polycarbonate with different zero-shear rate viscosities were tested at various injection speeds. Atter an initial rise, the wall shear stress in the sprue remains constant during the filling stage of the mold. The transient shear viscosity was determined from the known volumetric rate using a simplified one-dimensional flow approach and compared to the viscosity measured by traditional off-line rheometers. A finite element three-dimensional code is used to simulate the flow in the sprue with small and large width over thickness ratios. The pressures predicted are used in combination with the simplified theory to calculate the viscosity and compare the results from the experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".