MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033367708 · doi:10.3109/19396368.2013.775396

Evaluation of potential protein biomarkers in patients with high sperm DNA damage

2013· article· en· W2033367708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermMale infertilityDNA fragmentationBiologyAndrologySemenInfertilitySemen analysisSperm motilityFertilityGeneticsMedicinePopulationApoptosisPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The laboratory evaluation of male infertility remains an essential area of research as 40-60% of infertility cases are attributable to male-related factors. Current sperm analysis methods add only partial information on sperm quality and fertility outcomes. The specific underlying cause of infertility in most cases is unknown, while a proportion of male infertility could be caused by molecular factors such as the absence or abnormal expression of some essential sperm proteins. The objective of this study was to screen for associations between sperm protein profiles and sperm concentration, motility, and DNA fragmentation index in patients undergoing fertility evaluation in a clinical setting. Based on those parameters, semen samples were categorized as either normal or abnormal. We screened 34 semen samples with various abnormal parameters and compared them to 24 normal control samples by using one dimensional (1-D) gel electrophoresis and mass-spectrometry. In this study, we anticipated to establish a normal sperm parameter profile which would be compared to abnormal sperm samples and reveal candidate proteins. Our preliminary results indicate that no normal uniform profile could be established, which affirms the complexity of male fertility and confirms the limitations of standard semen analysis. Four main protein groups were identified in correlation with abnormal DNA fragmentation and/or motility. The first group included sperm nuclear proteins such as the SPANX (sperm protein associated with the nucleus on the X chromosome) isoforms and several types of histones. The second group contained mitochondria-related functions and oxidative stress proteins including Mitochondrial Ferritin, Mitochondrial Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein, and several isoforms of Peroxiredoxins. Two other protein groups were related to sperm motility such as microtubule-based flagellum and spindle microtubule as well as proteins related to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Further research is required in order to characterize these potential biomarkers of male fertility potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it