New hybrid inorganic-organic polymers containing cyclophosphazenes as pendant groups: Cyclophosphazene ligands containing hydrazone linkages and their conversion to polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of the cyclotriphosphazene N3P3Cl5[O-C6H4-p-C6H4-p-CH=CH2] (2) with 10 equiv of N-methylhydrazine proceeds in a regio-specific manner to afford the multi-functional hydrazide N3P3[N(Me)NH2]5[O- C6H4-p-C6H4-p-CH=CH2] (3). Condensation of 3 with o-hydroxy benzaldehyde or pyridine-2-carboxaldehyde affords the corresponding hydrazones N3P3[N(Me)N=CH-C6H4-o-OH]5[O-C6H4-p-C6H4-p-CH=CH2] (4) and N3P3[N(Me)N=CH-C6H4N]5[O-C6H4-p-C6H4-p-CH=CH2] (5), respectively. These hydrazones can be homopolymerized to afford polymers 6 and 7 containing multi-site coordinating cyclophosphazenes as pendant groups.Key words: cyclophosphazene, hydrazone, pendant polymers, hybrid polymers, polymeric ligands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".