MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033406013 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0445

Florence Nightingale on Social Change in India : Volume 10 of Collected Works of Florence Nightingale (review)

2009· article· en· W2033406013 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Judith Godden

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Development in India
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanitationPoliticsHistorySociologyPolitical scienceLawMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Florence Nightingale on Social Change in India: Volume 10 of Collected Works of Florence Nightingale Judith Godden (bio) Gérard Vallée, editor. Florence Nightingale on Social Change in India Volume 10 of Collected Works of Florence Nightingale. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. xiv, 952. $150.00 This book is the latest in the planned sixteen-volume set, under General Editor Lynn McDonald, of the Collected Works of Florence Nightingale. This volume of Nightingale’s writings on social change in India is divided into six main topics: implementing sanitary reform; village and town sanitation; land tenure and reform; reform in credit, co-operatives, education, and agriculture; the condition of women; and social and political evolution. Within these topics there are a number of themes, most notably the well-documented shift in Nightingale’s concern, which was initially for the British army in India but moved to encompass all Indians. In contrast to volume 9, also edited by Gérard Vallée (Florence Nightingale on Health in India, Wilfrid Laurier University Press 2006), this volume focuses on bottom-up reforms. Vallée provides an editorial overview as well as a concluding evaluation of Florence Nightingale’s contribution, ‘in light of the objectives she set for herself.’ He labels Jharna Gourlay’s conclusions (Florence Nightingale and the Health of the Raj, Ashgate 2003) as ‘highly positive,’ implying in a number of places that he is less sanguine. He points out that, ironically, Nightingale largely failed in her attempts to reform nursing in India. Vallée is wisely cautious in his overall assessment of Nightingale’s impact, as much of it was indirect, as a researcher and advocate. He concludes that her key contribution was that she helped ‘awakened energies’ that ultimately contributed to the reform of public health in India. That the problem of famine was solved only with [End Page 318] ‘independence and democracy’ points to the limited impact of this reclusive English reformer who never visited India and only gradually and partially accepted the need for Indian independence. Three sources provided by Nightingale in her self-evaluation provide an apt conclusion to the primary source material in this volume. At heart Nightingale appears a romantic, with her imagination accepting the popular image of India as an exotic jewel of the empire, even if peopled with agricultural scientists as much as rajahs. All that is needed, she appears to assume, is to locate people of goodwill (British administrators and ten or so Indians in each village) and then India would be transformed into a model civilization. That imperialism created essential conflicts of interest, and that imperialists’ interests dominated, does not appear to have struck home, even in the face of the new, devastating famines. As Vallée points out, the material in this volume also illustrates a consistent aspect of Nightingale’s method, that of working with an able collaborator. Many of these are men who, in an ironic twist to the gendered norm, have been overshadowed by Nightingale’s celebrity. This volume will allow us better to appreciate the role of these collaborators, notably Dr John Sutherland who drafted so much of her material, about nursing as well as Indian affairs. This volume also provides a fascinating insight into an array of characters such as the pioneering doctor Mary Scharlieb, whose husband was a civil servant in India. The main limitation of this volume is the paucity of personal correspondence to Indians. We are told that Nightingale had ‘native friends at all the presidency towns’; sent ‘encouraging letters’ to ‘Indian nationals’; and that she ‘collaborated notably with Runchorelal Chotalall, Behramji Malabari, Dhadabai Naoroji and Manmohun Ghose.’ The evidence for such assertions rests largely on claims in Nightingale’s letters to Europeans. No explanation is considered necessary for including just a total of five letters (all them extracts only) to the four named main Indian collaborators. Like the other volumes, this one is well produced, with the text easy to read. Most readers will find something to enjoy, as Florence Nightingale frequently writes with wit, energy, and warmth. While its cost will limit sales to individuals, it is an essential reference book for any library with readers interested in Nightingale...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicSocial and Economic Development in IndiaFrench-language works237,207