Determinants of nevirapine hypersensitivity and its effect on the association between hepatitis C status and mortality in antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-positive patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess risks factors and outcomes associated with nevirapine hypersensitivity reactions, and to determine the effect of hypersensitivity as a modifier of the association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and mortality among antiretroviral drug-naive patients. METHODS: The primary endpoint was hypersensitivity reactions in a population-based cohort of antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-individuals, 18 years or older in British Columbia, Canada, who started triple antiretroviral therapy with nevirapine between May 1997 and June 2003. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of nonaccidental mortality in the subgroup of patients with known HCV serostatus. RESULTS: A total of 66 (9.6%) of 685 patients met the definition for hypersensitivity reactions. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, no variables were identified as risk factors. In multivariate survival analyses conducted to identify characteristics associated with nonaccidental mortality, patients with both HCV coinfection and hypersensitivity reactions had a higher risk of death (hazard ratio, 7.12; 95% confidence interval, 2.73-18.53; P < 0.001) compared with those who did not have HCV coinfection or hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that the hypersensitivity reaction behaves as an effect modifier of the association between HCV infection and mortality in this cohort of antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-positive patients. These results support the current recommendation against the use of nevirapine in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".