The six nations of grand river territory's: Attempts at renewing international political relationships, 1921–1924
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citing treaties with England and the Netherlands acknowledging its sovereignty, the Six Nations of Grand River Territory in the 1920s publicly proclaimed its community a nation trapped within a nation. Using the recently established League of Nations as his catalyst, Six Nations spokesperson Levi General Deskaheh contacted the representatives of member countries to remind them of their obligations as treaty signatories while simultaneously seeking an audience with the League's general council. The theme of renewal is apparent in Deskaheh's actions: he believed past treaty relationships with Britain and the Netherlands could be renewed, thereby affirming Six Nations sovereignty. His actions also represent the first time that an Indian leader in Canada chose to forgo political interface with Canadian representatives in favour of petitioning a newly formed international body to act as political and cultural mediator. Deskaheh and the Six Nations’ approach preceded by several decades the creation of the United Nations Working Group on Indigenous Populations and the James Bay Cree international lobby efforts of the late twentieth century that halted hydroelectric development threatening their homelands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it