MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033427769 · doi:10.1109/rtp.2007.4383815

Excimer Laser Annealing of Ion-Implanted Silicon: Dopant Activation, Diffusion and Defect Formation

2007· article· en· W2033427769 on OpenAlexaff
Edouard V. Monakhov, B. G. Svensson, Antonino La Magna, Paola Alippi, M. Italia, V. Privitera, G. Fortunato, L. Mariucci, F. Tumisto, K. Kuitunen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopantMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)DopingDopant ActivationIon implantationSiliconExcimer laserOptoelectronicsRedistribution (election)Thermal diffusivityIonLaserOpticsComposite materialChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minimization of dopant diffusion during electrical activation is a crucial issue in developing sub-50 nm silicon technology. Excimer laser annealing (ELA) in the melting regime is capable of meeting the requirements on shallow junctions in terms of depth, doping concentration and abruptness. However, in order to be successfully employed it has to be demonstrated that ELA can be integrated in a device processing flow. Especially, the compatibility of ELA with other high temperature processing steps such as rapid thermal annealing (RTA) needs to be addressed. In this contribution, we report on phenomena observed for B redistribution that occur during ELA in B-implanted Si and after subsequent RTA. Specific topics to be covered include (i) B build-up at the maximum melt depth during ELA, and (ii) B activation and diffusion beyond the ELA melt depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207