Mourir dans la dignité : un défi pour l’humain, un lieu pour Dieu ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prenant appui sur l’expression très médiatisée en France de « mourir dans la dignité », l’auteur se demande comment l’expérience de la mort peut de nos jours constituer un lieu conjoint de la dignité et de l’homme et de Dieu. Sans renoncer à une approche ontologique de la dignité telle qu’elle se dessine dans la Déclaration des droits de l’homme de 1948, il plaide davantage pour une approche clinique de cette dernière : c’est au niveau de l’expérience concrète d’être respecté et accompagné comme humain que la personne malade appréhende qu’il existe un au-delà de l’altération capable de la maintenir dans sa dignité d’humain. C’est ce même comportement qui atteste conjointement de la dignité de Dieu qui, dans sa kénose, dit sa capacité à ne pas être étranger de l’aventure humaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.062 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".