MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033437654 · doi:10.7202/1018594ar

Une migration silencieuse. Paroles de prêtres laïcisés dans le diocèse de Rimouski

2013· article· fr· W2033437654 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Bernard Gagnon, Françoise Paradis Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Church History
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De 1965 à 1979, trente-quatre prêtres séculiers du diocèse de Rimouski ont quitté la prêtrise. Or, il existe au Québec peu d’études historiques et sociologiques sur le nombre précis des départs et les raisons de ceux-ci. S’il est possible d’avancer quelques facteurs clés pour mettre en contexte ces sorties — la modernisation et les changements dans les moeurs de la société québécoise, Vatican II et ses promesses avortées de réformes, ou encore la discipline du célibat —, les motivations, les intentions et les représentations des acteurs concernés n’ont pas été l’objet d’investigation détaillée. Pour remédier à ce fait, nous avons mené une série d’entretiens avec des prêtres et des anciens prêtres du diocèse de Rimouski qui étaient au coeur de la tourmente qui traversa l’Église locale sous la période à l’étude. Nous présentons dans cet article les premiers résultats de nos travaux ainsi que le constat général d’un écart marqué entre la signification «tumultueuse» et la concrétisation «discrète» des sorties dans le contexte du diocèse rimouskois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207