MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033552873 · doi:10.1115/pvp2009-77071

Azimuthal Behaviour of Self-Excited Diametral Modes of Internal Cavities

2009· article· en· W2033552873 on OpenAlexaff
Kareem Aly, Samir Ziada

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzimuthRotational symmetryMechanicsPhysicsSpinningSuperposition principleAmplitudeOscillation (cell signaling)Excited stateMach numberAcousticsMaterials scienceOpticsComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aerodynamic excitation of ducted cavity diametral modes, which are inherently antisymmetric acoustic modes, by the oscillation of the axisymmetric free shear layer gives rise to complex flow-sound interaction mechanisms, in which the acoustic diametral modes do not possess a preferred azimuthal orientation. The azimuthal behaviour of this self-excitation mechanism is investigated experimentally. The study is performed for axisymmetric shallow cavities in a duct for a range of cavity length to depth ratio of L/d = 1 to 4, and for Mach numbers up to 0.4. Three pressure transducers flush mounted to the cavity floor are used to determine the acoustic mode amplitude and orientation. The excited acoustic modes are classified into spinning, partially spinning and stationary diametral modes. An analytical model based on the superposition of two orthogonal modes with 90° temporal phase shift is developed to reproduce the spinning and the partially spinning diametral modes. The developed model clarifies the observed complex behaviour of the azimuthal modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207