Performance and bunk attendance of cattle fed steam-rolled or ground corn supplemented with laidlomycin and chlortetracycline or monensin and tylosin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
British cross steer calves (n = 240; 332 ± 23 kg) in 16 pens were fed ground (G) or steam-rolled (SR) corn-based finishing diets medicated with 12 mg kg-1 laidlomycin propionate and 42.2 mg kg-1 chlortetracycline hydrochloride (LC) or with 30.4 mg kg-1 monensin sodium and 10.5 mg kg-1 tylosin phosphate (MT) in a 2 × 2 factorial experiment. Individual bunk attendance was monitored using radio frequency identification in one pen per diet. Finishing diets were fed for 125 d following a 27-d adaptation from 65 to 91% concentrate diet. In the first 56 d and overall, daily dry matter intake (DMI) was greater (P < 0.05) with LC than with MT (8.8 vs. 8.3 kg), but did not differ (P = 0.97) between G and SR diets. There was a trend (P = 0.11) towards greater ADG for cattle fed LC than those fed MT (1.54 vs. 1.47 kg d-1), but gain:feed was similar (0.169; P = 0.80) between antibiotic supplements. Processing method did not (P = 0.29) affect rate of gain, but SR tended (P = 0.06) to improve gain:feed compared with G (0.171 vs. 0.165). Steers fed LC spent more (P < 0.001) time at the bunk than those fed MT (125 vs. 120 min d-1). On G diets, cattle fed LC made fewer daily visits (9.3 vs. 9.5 visits d-1; P = 0.03), but spent more time at the bunk (135.9 vs. 124.0 min d-1; P < 0.001) resulting in greater duration per meal (15.4 vs. 13.7 min meal-1; P < 0.001). These cattle also had the greatest deviation in daily duration at the bunk (37.3 vs. 33.7 min; P < 0.001). The prevalence of liver abscesses was 13.2% with LC and 6.5% with MT (P = 0.09). However, the prevalence of severely abscessed livers (2.9%) was unaffected (P = 0.45) by treatment. The prevalence of foot rot was greater (P = 0.02) for cattle fed MT (7.5%) than for cattle fed LC (0.8%). Compared with feeding MT, feeding LC may enhance ADG, possibly due to greater DMI. Key words: Beef, chlortetracycline, corn processing, laidlomycin, monensin, tylosin
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".