MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033590705 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.38.4.801

BOLEITE: RESOLUTION OF THE FORMULA, K Pb26 Ag9 Cu24 Cl62 (OH)48

2000· article· en· W2033590705 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
M. A. Cooper, F. C. Hawthorne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyResolution (logic)MathematicsMineralogyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure of boleite, K Pb26 Ag9 Cu24 Cl62 (OH)48, a 15.288(2) Å, V 3574(1) Å3, Pm 3̅m, Z = 1, has been refined to an R-index of 2.2% based on 884 observed (5σ) reflections collected with MoKα X-radiation. A new site was resolved, and site-scattering refinement showed it to be occupied by a scattering species with 19 epfu (electrons per formula unit); this result is in accord with complete occupancy of this site by K. Potassium was detected by electron-microprobe analysis, but the amount determined is only ~50% of the amount indicated by site-scattering refinement. However, the refinement results show K to be disordered within a large cage in the structure, and the electron-beam bombardment probably induces rapid migration of K within the structure. Infrared spectroscopy shows that there is no H2O present in the structure. The H-sites were determined during refinement, and a sensible H-bonding scheme results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207