Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2001 Cape Town Convention and associated Protocols relating to aircraft objects, railway rolling stock and space assets are among the most ambitious international instruments ever to have been concluded in the field of commercial transactional law. The Convention and Aircraft Protocol, which together consist of no fewer than 99 Articles, have been widely adopted and more ratifications are in train. Central to the Convention is the International Registry in which international interests, and, in the case of aircraft objects and space assets, sales, can be registered and secure priority over subsequently registered interests and unregistered interests. By the end of 2011, in under six years since it came into operation, the International Registry for aircraft objects in Dublin had processed 313,000 registrations. The priority rules constitute key provisions of the Convention. In this article Roy Goode, who chaired the UNIDROIT Study Group and Drafting Committee and the Drafting Committee at the Diplomatic Conference on the Convention and Aircraft Protocol in Ottawa, and acted as Rapporteur at the Diplomatic Conferences in Luxembourg in 2007 to adopt the Rail Protocol and Berlin in 2012 to adopt the Space Protocol, provides a detailed analysis of the priority rules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".