MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Annexin 1 Is Secreted in Situ During Ulcerative Colitis in Humans

2004· article· en· W2033600001 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Vergnolle, Philippe Pagès, Rosine Guimbaud, Stanislas Chaussade, Lionel Buéno, J Escourrou, Christine Coméra

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnexin A1Ulcerative colitisAnnexinAnnexin A2Inflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineSecretionInflammationColitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyAnnexin A5ExtracellularPathologyDiseaseChemistryStainingBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although annexin l exerts extracellular anti-inflammatory properties, little is known about its release in inflammatory diseases. Here, we characterized annexin 1 secretion in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Annexin 1 was detected by immunoblotting, in tissue homogenates and supernatants of colonic biopsies incubated in culture media, and in luminal colonic perfusates of UC patients. Annexin 1 was released by inflamed colonic biopsies from patients having severe UC but not by biopsies from healthy colon of the same patient or by biopsies from non-UC patients or from patients with slight or moderate UC. Annexin 1 was detected in luminal colonic perfusates of patients having moderate or slight UC but not in perfusates from control patients. The level of annexin 1 expression and secretion was unrelated to long-term glucocorticoid treatment, but annexin 1 secretion in perfusates was induced, in some patients, by short-term glucocorticoid exposure. These results show that annexin 1 is secreted endogenously in the colon of patients with UC. This secretion, which occurs both in vitro and in vivo, depends on the severity of inflammation. Given the anti-inflammatory effects of annexin 1, this protein may serve to down-regulate the inflammatory response in the course of inflammatory bowel disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207