Annexin 1 Is Secreted in Situ During Ulcerative Colitis in Humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although annexin l exerts extracellular anti-inflammatory properties, little is known about its release in inflammatory diseases. Here, we characterized annexin 1 secretion in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Annexin 1 was detected by immunoblotting, in tissue homogenates and supernatants of colonic biopsies incubated in culture media, and in luminal colonic perfusates of UC patients. Annexin 1 was released by inflamed colonic biopsies from patients having severe UC but not by biopsies from healthy colon of the same patient or by biopsies from non-UC patients or from patients with slight or moderate UC. Annexin 1 was detected in luminal colonic perfusates of patients having moderate or slight UC but not in perfusates from control patients. The level of annexin 1 expression and secretion was unrelated to long-term glucocorticoid treatment, but annexin 1 secretion in perfusates was induced, in some patients, by short-term glucocorticoid exposure. These results show that annexin 1 is secreted endogenously in the colon of patients with UC. This secretion, which occurs both in vitro and in vivo, depends on the severity of inflammation. Given the anti-inflammatory effects of annexin 1, this protein may serve to down-regulate the inflammatory response in the course of inflammatory bowel disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".