MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033606624 · doi:10.1109/tia.2010.2074170

Numerical Models for AC Electroosmotic Micropumps

2010· article· en· W2033606624 on OpenAlexaff
Michal Přibyl, Kazimierz Adamiak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrochannelMechanicsPoisson's equationElectric fieldFinite element methodDielectricDebye lengthMomentum (technical analysis)DebyeElectric potentialMaterials sciencePhysicsElectronic engineeringThermodynamicsIonElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AC electroosmotic pumping of fluids in a microchannel with two thin coplanar electrodes, deposited on one dielectric wall and placed in an aqueous solution, is studied in this paper. Two different numerical formulations are compared. In the first one, the transport equations (mass, molar, and momentum balances) for the ion concentration and the Poisson equation for the electric field are solved simultaneously in the time domain without any simplification of the computational domain except that the dielectric walls are neglected. In the second one, a time average model is assumed, and the Debye layer is represented by an approximate 1-D model. In both cases, the finite-element method implemented in the COMSOL commercial software is used as a numerical tool. The results for the electric field, space charge, and velocity distributions are compared with a qualitative agreement between both models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207