MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033637008 · doi:10.3917/geco.105.0050

Les organismes HLM en lutte contre les dépôts intempestifs d'encombrants et les locataires qui dégradent, une qualité de service impossible ?

2011· article· fr· W2033637008 on OpenAlexaff
Pascal Ughetto

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales des Mines - Gérer et comprendre · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans leur parc locatif, les organismes HLM sont soumis à des dégradations qui constituent pour eux une énigme et occasionnent des difficultés de gestion. Ces organismes sont effectivement très nombreux à avoir développé des politiques de qualité de service qui se sont traduites par d’importants efforts en matière d’organisation (notamment la formalisation de process) . Les dégradations s’analysent comme des actes qui désorganisent cet effort d’organisation et obligent les personnels de terrain à improviser des réponses, à côté ou en dehors de lui. Elles révèlent aussi le fait que certains locataires ne sont pas spontanément intéressés par la qualité de service ou, tout du moins, interrogent la capacité des enquêtes de satisfaction à saisir la complexité du rapport de ces derniers à la qualité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales des Mines - Gérer et comprendreSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207