MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033641004 · doi:10.1021/op025519p

The Synthesis of Poly(arylene ether)s in Solution at Pilot-Plant Scale with Control over Molecular Weight and End-Group Composition

2002· article· en· W2033641004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsXerox (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAryleneEtherComposition (language)Group (periodic table)Component (thermodynamics)Scale (ratio)Materials scienceChemistryPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryArylPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lab-scale optimization and pilot-plant-scale synthesis of a poly(aryl ether ketone) is reported. The polymer produced had the desired properties of low molecular weight ( M w = 14−15 kD, M n = 6.3−6.5 kD), reasonable polydispersity (PD = 2.37−2.39), and well-defined controlled end groups. This has been accomplished using a one-step solution polymerization of 4,4‘-difluorobenzophenone (DFBP), bisphenol A (BPA), and 4- tert -butylphenol (tBP). The presence or absence of a stoichiometric amount of tBP in the polymerization reaction dictated whether the obtained polymer possessed exclusively a halide or a tert -butylphenol terminus. Simple variation of the ratio of difluorobenzophenone to BPA controls the molecular weight of the obtained polymer without affecting the polydispersity. Several other factors were examined to completely optimize the polymerization process: the replacement of 4,4‘-difluorobenzophenone with 4,4‘-dichlorobenzophenone as a cost-saving measure, the effect of temperature, and the effect of the concentration of the reactants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it