MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033646862 · doi:10.1121/1.4782159

Directionality of acoustic <i>T</i>-phase signals from shallow submarine earthquakes

2004· article· en· W2033646862 on OpenAlexaff
Ross Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyAcousticsSeamountPhase (matter)SIGNAL (programming language)SubmarineChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsTelecommunicationsOceanographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic transients radiated from shallow undersea earthquakes were studied in an experiment carried out using a towed horizontal line array operating in the South Fiji Basin. The transient signals consisted of P, S, and T phases, with the T-phase signal from each earthquake lasting for about 5 min. During this period, the directionality of the T-phase signal was determined by processing the array data with a conventional beamformer. The weakest part of the signal arrived first on a direct bearing between the earthquake source and the array. However, subsequent stronger components of the T phase arrived from different directions farther south of the source, in a region where a number of seamounts rose within the sound channel. A simple model based on ray-path travel times for p-wave travel in the earth and in the water suggests that the later components of the T-phase signal are radiated into the water by downslope propagation from the seamounts and ridges. The initial weaker components may be scattered into the sound channel by leakage from the P and S phases relatively closer to the array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207