Dipole tilt control of the magnetopause for southward IMF from global magnetohydrodynamic simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerical results from a physics‐based global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model are used to examine the effect of the dipole tilt angle (ψ) on the location and shape of the magnetopause. Identification of the magnetopause location in the simulation domain is automated using criteria based on the current density and the shape of the streamlines. These data are fitted with a three‐dimensional surface controlled by 10 configuration parameters which allow description of the cusp geometry as well as the asymmetry in the Z direction and the azimuthal asymmetry of the magnetopause. Effects of dipole tilt angle on the configuration parameters are analyzed from a series of simulations for southward IMF and different dipole tilt angle values. It is found that dipole tilt angle has little impact on the equatorial magnetopause but significantly affects the cusp locations and the degree of asymmetry between the Northern and Southern hemispheres and the equatorial/meridional plane. The results are shown to be consistent with three frequently used empirical models derived from satellite observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".