MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2033697515 · doi:10.1115/fuelcell2009-85189

Modeling of Liquid Water Transport in Cathode Catalyst Layer of PEM Fuel Cells

2009· article· en· W2033697515 on OpenAlexafffund
Prodip K. Das, Xianguo Li, Zhongsheng Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsBC Innovation CouncilUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsWettingWater transportProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrolyteCathodeChemical engineeringLiquid waterElectrochemistryConductivityChemistryContact angleMaterials scienceSaturation (graph theory)CatalysisEnvironmental engineeringElectrodeThermodynamicsComposite materialWater flowOrganic chemistryEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell is significantly affected by liquid water generated at the cathode catalyst layer (CCL). Conversely, the ionic conductivity of PEM is directly proportional to its water content; it must have sufficient water. Therefore, it is essential to maintain a delicate water balance, which seems difficult without properly understanding liquid water transport from the CCL. In the present study, a one-dimensional analytical solution of liquid water transport across the CCL is derived from the fundamental transport equations. The effect of CCL wettability on liquid water transport and the effect of liquid water “flooding” on reactant transport have been investigated. It has been observed that hydrophilic characteristic of a CCL plays significant role on the liquid water transport. The liquid water saturation in a hydrophilic CCL can be reduced by increasing the surface wettability or lowering contact angle. Based on a dimensionless time constants analysis, it has been shown that liquid water production from the phase change process is negligible compared to water production from the electrochemical process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→