The efficacy of acupuncture treatment on pain and ability with osteoarthritis of the knee-Examination of the curative effect by the depth of an acupuncture needle-
Bibliographic record
Abstract
【目的】変形性膝関節症 (以下、 膝OA) に伴う運動機能と痛みに対し、 鍼刺入深度の違いが及ぼす効果を検討した。 【対象】膝OAと診断された患者のうち研究条件に適合した患者26名。 【方法】コンピュータによりA) 浅刺群 (3mm前後の刺入)、 B) 深刺群 (10～20mm刺入) の2群に分類し、 下肢の圧痛点10ケ所に対して10分間の置鍼を行った。 【評価】膝痛の主観的な評価としてvisual analogue scale (VAS) を、 運動機能の客観的な評価としてTimed Up & Go test、 20m歩行時間、 階段昇降時間を、 膝OAのQOL評価としてWestern Ontario and MacMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) をそれぞれ4週ごとに計4回記録した。 【結果】痛みの程度は両群ともに治療前と比較して有意に改善したが (p<0.05)、 客観的な運動機能はすべての測定項目において、 治療前と比較して浅刺群のみ有意に改善した (p<0.05)。 【結語】浅刺は痛みと運動機能を改善しQOL向上に寄与したことから、 膝OAの症状に対する、 より効果的な治療方法である可能性が示唆された。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".