MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033722246 · doi:10.1115/1.4002584

Measurement of Average Contact Angles of Gas Diffusion Layers Using a Novel Fluorescence Microscopy Method

2010· article· en· W2033722246 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWettingProton exchange membrane fuel cellContact angleCapillary actionPenetration (warfare)Materials sciencePorosityTetrafluoroethyleneGaseous diffusionPorous mediumComposite materialMembraneFuel cellsChemical engineeringChemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the major problems of current proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells is water management. The gas diffusion layer (GDL) of the fuel cell plays an important role in water management since humidification and water removal are both achieved through the GDL. Various numerical models were developed to illustrate the multiphase flow and transport in the fuel cell. The accuracy of these models depends on the accurate measurement of the GDL properties such as wettability, surface energy, and porosity. Most of the studies conducted for measuring the wettability of the GDL are based on the external contact angle measurements. However, the external contact angle does not describe adequately the capillary forces acting on the water inside the GDL pores. In a recent study, the capillary penetration technique has been used to measure indirectly the wettability of the GDL based on the experimental height increase due to penetration of the liquid into the porous sample. In essence, the height penetration technique was used along with the general Washburn equation to determine the surface properties of GDLs [Friess and Hoorfar, 2010, “Measurement of Internal Wettability of Gas Diffusion Porous Media of PEM Fuel Cells,” J. Power Sources, 195, pp. 4736–4742]. The shortcoming of this method is that it is only effective for thin GDL samples with low poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) loading since the digital images acquired to find the height of penetration has a limited contrast between the penetrated and unpenetrated areas. Since fuel cells need to use different combinations of PTFE loading and thickness depending on the desired use of the cell, it is important to find a way to measure the contact angle of the GDLs with different PTFE loadings and thicknesses. This paper presents a novel fluorescence microscopy method that drastically improves the contrast in the images and allows for the accurate measurement of the height of penetration of the test liquid at each time step. This penetrated height values are then used along with an optimization method (which finds the best fit between the general Washburn equation and the experimental data) to calculate the contact angle of the test liquid on the GDL sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it