MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2033731204 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2006.376963

Almost-Sure Convergence of a Class of Nonautonomous Fictitious Play

2006· article· en· W2033731204 on OpenAlexaff
N. Léchevin, C.A. Rabbath

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsNash equilibriumConvergence (economics)Fictitious playApplied mathematicsDiscrete time and continuous timeRate of convergenceExponential stabilityMathematical optimizationComputer scienceNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nonautonomous version of continuous-time fictitious play is considered to achieve global asymptotic stability of a unique Nash equilibrium of a game. The proposed approach to prove global asymptotic stability consists of combining successively in time a continuous-time static fictitious play characterized by a time-varying rate of convergence with a continuous-time proportional derivative fictitious play, which has been recently proposed. Convergence to the basin of attraction of the empirical frequency of the proportional derivative fictitious play, if it exists, is obtained by means of contraction tools, reminiscent of the small-gain theorem, provided a set of inequalities involving the parameter of the continuous-time dynamics is satisfied. Furthermore, a discrete-time fictitious play is derived from its continuous-time counterpart. Convergence with probability one to the unique Nash equilibrium is shown. The approach is illustrated with a modified version of the Shapley game for which the proposed scheme is shown to be convergent to the unique equilibrium with the additional flexibility of selecting the rate of convergence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEconomic theories and models→French-language works237,207→